Carbon-Neutral, Carbon-Negative. Confused by All the Carbon Jargon?

Did you know that by 2030, Microsoft is planning to become a carbon-negative company? Microsoft and other renowned companies like Apple, IKEA, and H&M have started controlling their carbon emissions and traces caused due to their production plants in the atmosphere. It is one of the significant commitments from the companies to tackle the adverse effects of climate change. It draws attention to follow the best practices to reduce and remove harmful emissions of carbon dioxide to meet the international climate goals.

Suppose fossil fuels such as natural gases, oil, or coal are burned. They emit harmful gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and other gases into the atmosphere. These gases, primarily carbon dioxide, cause adverse effects on the atmosphere and environment and initiate smog and acid rain. The gases play a significant role in drastic climate change that is already affecting the entire world. Many countries are experiencing extreme weather conditions such as drought, heatwaves, hot weather, heavy rain, floods, and landslides. Other consequences of the briskly changing climate include sea-level rise, ocean acidification, and biodiversity loss.

The primary sources of the emission of these harmful gases are more extensive industrial operations and modes of transport such as cars, ships, trucks, aeroplanes, and coal-fired power plants. The power plants and industries adopt carbon-neutral and carbon-negative best practices to control the indeterminate and uncontrollable carbon dioxide emission in the atmosphere. You might have come across the carbon-negative and carbon-neutral terms, but do you know how they differ? So, look at what these carbon jargons – carbon negative and carbon-neutral mean in practice and how they differ.